Until this incident, Mr. Smith said that he has
always had good relations with all of his co-workers. The company
put Mr. Smith on probation for a period of one year on September 9,
2002. Mr. Smith feels that he has been targeted by an overly
sensitive co-worker who objects to Mr. Smith’s inoffensive display of
pride in his Confederate ancestry.
The punishment was based on three allegations.
The first was that Mr. Smith wore an offensive hat to work. Mr.
Smith admits that he wore a cap to work that had the logo of the Sons of
Confederate Veterans on it. Smith is a member of an Augusta,
Georgia SCV Camp. He had worn the same cap many times before and
had never heard any complaints. Smith denies, however, that the
logo is offensive.
The Sons of Confederate Veterans is an
international heritage organization composed of the descendants of
veterans of the Confederate States of America. The logo
incorporates an image of a square Confederate battle flag. Mr.
Smith contends that the Confederate flag on his hat is a venerated
symbol of his Confederate Southern American ancestry.
The second allegation is vague. It simply
states, “Richard was involved in two previous incidents both related to
infringement of an individual’s rights to working a harassment free work
environment.” In referring to this, the lawsuit asserts that “on
information and belief Smith thinks the Defendant is referring to his
display of the state flag of Georgia (which also incorporates the
Confederate battle flag into its design) in his office and to the
presence of a jar of barbeque sauce and a box of crackers that agents of
the Defendant objected to on the grounds that said food products were
racially divisive.”
Allegedly lambasting the human resources
representative and shouting profanity is the basis for the third
complaint. Again, Mr. Smith denies that the interchange was
anywhere near so dramatic. He responded to this saying, “Yes I was
upset and concerned and I asked that [the HR representative’s] demand be
put in writing, but I was in no way indignant.”
Attorney Kirk D. Lyons, chief trial counsel for
the Southern Legal Resource Center remarked that, “I am stunned to think
that one's choice of food and drink would be used as a pretext for
placing an employee on probation.” “If food products,” he
continued “can be labeled as ‘racially divisive’ then no object or idea
is safe from those people who hate Southern heritage.” "Southern
workers might want to go ahead and remove moon pies, RC Cola and KFC
from their work stations if they don't want to be in the unemployment
line!" Lyons added.
H.K. Edgerton, former Asheville, NC president of
the NAACP and current member of the board of directors of the SLRC is
currently conducting a “March Across Dixie” to raise awareness about
issues such as this. When he found out that a man was on probation
for, among other things, having a box of Winn-Dixie Georgia crackers and
a bottle of Maurice’s BBQ sauce, Mr. Edgerton said, “It’s a sad day in
the Southland of America when a man has to watch what food he buys to
avoid being called a racist. Who ever heard of racist food
products?”
The Southern Legal Resource Center, Inc. is a
non-profit South Carolina public law firm that advocates civil rights
for Confederate Southern Americans.
For more information about HK's March Across Dixie
contact:
http://www.southerncaucus.org/hkedgerton.htm